Talcum Powder Lawsuit Lawyers |

Most people are unaware that talcum powder can be dangerous, and lead to cancer. Companies like Johnson & Johnson have been sued for not warning women of the dangers.

The “average settlement for talcum powder” is a lawsuit that was filed in 2013. The case has been dismissed, but the lawyer’s are still looking for compensation.

(This page was last updated on December 20, 2018)

More than 20 studies have connected talc powder to ovarian cancer since 1971. Women who used talcum powder were 33 percent more likely to develop ovarian cancer, according to a 2003 review of 16 of these studies.

Our lawyers are pursuing ovarian cancer cases on behalf of women who got the disease after using talcum powder for feminine hygiene.

Johnson & Johnson, the maker of popular talc-based powders including Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower, is accused of knowing about the risk of ovarian cancer since at least 1971 but failing to notify customers. As a consequence, talc lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been launched by hundreds of women.

A St. Louis jury awarded Lois Slemp of Virginia $110 million after finding J&J responsible for Ms. Slemp’s ovarian cancer. In July 2018, twenty-two more women were awarded $4.7 billion in talc damages.

Our lawyers would want to chat with you if you or someone you know acquired ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talcum powder. For more information, schedule a free, no-obligation legal consultation with us now.

What Are Some Talc Products and Their Applications? 

For decades, talc, the softest mineral known to man, has been the primary ingredient in baby powder and other cosmetics. Talcum powder absorbs moisture and decreases friction. These characteristics, along with its inherent softness, make it a great component in face and body powders.

Talc is most well-known for being the principal component in Johnson & Johnson’s famed Johnson’s Baby Powder. Many women apply baby powder on their genitals for feminine hygiene, which has been linked to an increased risk of ovarian cancer in several studies.

Other plaintiffs claim that J&J’s talcum powders included asbestos, which led them to develop mesothelioma, a disease that is lethal.

What are some of the possible side effects of talc? 

Talcum powder has the potential to induce major adverse effects. Researchers have suspected a relationship between talcum powder and ovarian cancer for decades. When talc powder is applied near the genitals, it is thought to travel to the ovaries and get entrenched in the tissue.

Women who used talcum powder during ovulation were 92 percent more likely to develop ovarian cancer, according to research.

Despite the fact that talc is a natural mineral, the body has a tough time eliminating the particles. Inflammation may develop, and malignant tumors may grow as a consequence. Talcum powder has also been proven to raise the risk of lung cancer when breathed.

A research published in the medical journal The Lancet in 1971 discovered that talc particles were “deeply lodged” in the majority of ovarian cancers. Researchers discovered in 1982 that women who used talcum powder during ovulation were 92% more likely to develop ovarian cancer.

Over the following 30 years, 21 further research on talc powder were conducted. Almost every one of these investigations revealed that women who used these items near their genitals had a higher risk of ovarian cancer.

Talc usage around the genitals is still considered a “risk factor” for ovarian cancer by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.

Do Talc Labels Indicate Health Hazards?

No, despite accumulating evidence that talc-based powders raise the risk of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, Johnson & Johnson and other manufacturers have not included warnings on their products.

Which Companies Are Affected by Talc Lawsuits? 

A lawsuit might be filed against any talc-based product maker who has contributed to a woman obtaining ovarian cancer. Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company failed to warn women about the danger of ovarian cancer from using their famous baby powder in the pelvic region. One similar instance (Jacqueline Fox; see below) led in $72 million in monetary awards.

What Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Johnson & Johnson?

The following are some of the most well-known talc litigation against Johnson & Johnson:

Johnson & Johnson et al. v. Deane Berg (2013)

Deane Berg, a physician’s assistant, filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson in 2013 after developing ovarian cancer, which she claims was caused by her habitual use of baby powder. Ms. Berg declined a $1.3 million settlement and took the issue to court, where Johnson & Johnson was found guilty of negligence, fraud, and conspiracy for failing to warn women about the health dangers associated with its products.

Johnson & Johnson et al. v. Mona Estrada (2014)

Mona Estrada of California filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson in April 2014, alleging that the company failed to notify women about the elevated risk of ovarian cancer.

“As a consequence of the defendants’ misrepresentations and omissions, plaintiff and the proposed class have acquired a potentially fatal product,” the lawsuit read.

Ms. Estrada claims she has not been injured, but she claims she would not have used Johnson’s Baby Powder for the last 60 years if she had known about the negative health impacts.

Johnson & Johnson et al. v. Barbara Mihalich (2014)

Barbara Mihalich of Illinois filed a class action lawsuit the next month, claiming that Johnson & Johnson used fraudulent business tactics and benefited unfairly from their talc products.

Neither Ms. Estrada nor Ms. Mihalich have ovarian cancer or any other talc-related side effects, but they claim they have been financially harmed as a result of buying Johnson & Johnson’s dangerous goods over a long period of time.

Johnson & Johnson et al. v. Gloria Ristesund (2016)

Gloria Ristesund developed ovarian cancer after using Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower Powder on her pelvic region for decades, and a Missouri jury concluded in her favor in May 2016. (Ms. Ristesund had to have a hysterectomy and other procedures as a consequence.) Ms. Ristesund was awarded $55 million by the jury, including $50 million in punitive damages and $5 million in compensatory damages.

Johnson & Johnson, on the other hand, successfully appealed the decision in June 2018.

Johnson & Johnson v. Deborah Giannecchini (2016)

Deborah Giannecchini of Modesto, California was granted $70 million by a jury in St. Louis in October 2016. After years of using Johnson’s Baby Powder, Ms. Giannecchini was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2012.

Jim Onder, the plaintiff’s lawyer, said that the jury’s decision “once again reiterated the necessity for Johnson & Johnson to warn the public about the ovarian cancer risk linked with their product.”

“We are governed by the research, which supports the safety of Johnson’s Baby Powder,” Johnson & Johnson stated again, adding that it will appeal.

Johnson & Johnson v. Lois Slemp (2017)

In May 2017, a jury in St. Louis awarded Lois Slemp (62) of Wise, Virginia, a stunning $110 million. Ms. Slemp claimed that during a 40-year period, her daily use of Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower products led her to develop ovarian cancer, which subsequently migrated to her liver. Ms. Slemp also claimed that Johnson’s Baby Powder included asbestos, which was refuted by the business.

The jury overwhelmingly favored Ms. Slemp. Punitive damages accounted for $105 million of the $110 million award.

“Once again, we’ve proved that these firms rejected the scientific facts and continue to refuse their obligations to the women of America,” Ms. Slemp’s attorney, Ted Meadows, said. They opted to prioritize money above people, paying millions to sway scientific and regulatory scrutiny.”

Johnson & Johnson has said that it would appeal the decision.

Johnson & Johnson v. Stephen Lanzo (2018)

A New Jersey jury awarded investment banker Stephan Lanzo and his wife $117 million in April 2018: $80 million in punitive damages and $37 million in compensatory damages. Mr. Lanzo stated that he developed mesothelioma after using Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower products for more than 30 years. These items, he said, contained asbestos, which causes mesothelioma.

Mr. Lanzo must have been exposed to asbestos in his childhood home or school, according to Johnson & Johnson, and these places are to blame for his mesothelioma. Mr. Lanzo and his wife were awarded a staggering $117 million by the jury.

Johnson & Johnson challenged the judgment, but it was affirmed by a state court in New Jersey.

Who Can File a Lawsuit Against Talc?

If you or a loved one developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma as a result of using talc-based products, you may be entitled to compensation for a variety of reasons:

  • Suffering and pain
  • Medical bills
  • Wages that have been lost
  • Expenses for a funeral (in the event of a loved one’s death)

How much does it set you back?

Nothing. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means that we only get paid if the case is successful. We accept a certain proportion of the recovery (usually one-third).

What are the benefits of contacting Morgan & Morgan?

Because we represent ordinary Americans who want to hold giant corporations responsible, our slogan is “For the People.” For years, we fought Big Tobacco and won $90 million in judgments and settlements.

With over 400 lawyers, we are one of the biggest consumer protection businesses in the nation.

We are trial attorneys who aren’t afraid to take on major businesses, and we have the track record to back it up.

We are one of the few consumer protection businesses in the nation with the resources to take on Johnson & Johnson and other corporations of its magnitude, with over 400 lawyers and a support team of over 2,000 employees.

We’ve earned $5 billion for our clients thus far.

What Should You Do Before Filing a Lawsuit?

For a free consultation, please contact us right away. Because these actions are time-sensitive, you should contact us as soon as possible to find out whether you are awarded money for damages.

The “what is going on with talcum powder cases” are lawsuits filed against companies that use talcum powder in their products. The plaintiffs allege that the companies failed to disclose the risk of ovarian cancer associated with its use.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average payout for talcum powder lawsuit?

A: The average payout for a talcum powder lawsuit is around $15,000.

How long does it take to settle a talcum powder case?

A: It is difficult to determine how long it would take for a talcum powder case to settle.

Who is eligible for talcum powder lawsuit?

A: Anyone who has used talcum powder and developed mesothelioma.

Related Tags

  • talcum powder class action lawsuit
  • talcum powder lawsuit update 2021
  • first talcum powder lawsuit
  • will j&j settle talcum powder cases
  • talcum powder lawsuit update 2020