Talcum Powder Ovarian and Cervical Cancer Lawsuit |

A lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 3, 2017. The lawsuit alleges that talcum powders may have been a cause of ovarian and cervical cancer.

The “ovarian cancer lawsuit update 2020” is a lawsuit that has been filed against Johnson & Johnson. The plaintiffs are suing them for false advertising and negligence due to their use of talcum powder in their products.

(As of May 24, 2018)

Talc is the world’s softest mineral, a clay derivative that has long been the principal ingredient in baby powder and other cosmetics. Talcum powder decreases friction and absorbs moisture, and when paired with its inherent softness, it’s a great ingredient for face and body powders.

After bringing claims, women who developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder were paid tens of millions of dollars.

The more we discover about talc, however, the more hazardous it looks to be. Concerning research on its linkages to lung and ovarian cancer have been published over the last 50 years.

Several women have recently been awarded tens of millions of dollars apiece after bringing cases alleging that they developed ovarian cancer as a result of using talcum powders for many years. After developing mesothelioma, others have gotten million-dollar judgments.

Thousands of people have sued Johnson & Johnson for talc contamination.

Talc’s Brief History

For thousands of years, talc has been utilized in a variety of ways. Soapstone was used to make dishes, decorations, and sculptures in ancient times. Talc is also included in a wide range of chalks and marking powders.

But it wasn’t until the end of the nineteenth century that talc became well-known. The Johnson & Johnson firm, which made medical plasters at the time, received complaints in 1893 that their plasters hurt people’s skin. As a result, Fred Kilmer, the company’s Scientific Director, gave consumers little tins of talc to alleviate their discomfort. Customers praised the powder for its effectiveness in treating diaper rash.

¬†Johnson’s Baby Powder was introduced in 1893, ushering in a new era of goods that earned Johnson & Johnson the title “The Baby’s Company.”

The advertising business exploded after World War I, and Johnson & Johnson benefited. Johnson’s Baby Powder was the subject of the company’s biggest campaign in history. As a result, the powder became a common household item in the United States.

Despite safety concerns (see below), talc is extensively used today, not only in baby powder but in a wide range of sectors, including cosmetics, ceramics, medicines, and sports.

Concerns About Talc’s Safety

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released an article titled “Dangers from Talcum Powder” in June 1969, stating:

The dangers of inhaling talcum powder, which may cause acute or chronic lung illness, are well known among pediatricians. At least three deaths have been documented as a result of newborns inhaling talcum powder. According to a conversation with the New York Poison Control Center, around 50 instances of talcum powder aspiration are reported to the center each year.

The American Academy of Pediatrics still cautions parents against using baby powder because of the danger of inhalation, which may lead to lung damage or even death.

Baby powder included asbestos until the 1970s, which has been linked to lung cancer and mesothelioma. Although Johnson & Johnson has eliminated the asbestos, they have not been able to eradicate the additional hazards associated with talc.

Over 20 research have connected talcum powder to ovarian cancer since 1971.

More than 20 studies have connected talc powder to ovarian cancer since 1971. Women who used talcum powder were 33 percent more likely to develop ovarian cancer, according to a 2003 review of 16 of these studies. Johnson & Johnson is accused of knowing about the ovarian cancer risk since at least 1982, but failing to notify women who used these products.

Men who mined or milled talc were more likely to acquire lung illness, including lung cancer, according to a 1995 research by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The death rate among talc employees was significantly greater than predicted, underscoring the idea that talc consumption is not recommended on a regular basis.

Women who use talc for feminine hygiene have an elevated risk of ovarian cancer, according to research. “Perineal talc use has been associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in a number of case-control studies,” according to a 1999 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, which concluded that “perineal talc use may modestly increase the risk of invasive serious ovarian cancer.”¬†

Talc powder “is related with a small 20-30% increase in risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer,” according to results published in 2013 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Internal letters revealed during the Jacqueline Fox trial that Johnson & Johnson management were aware of the dangers: one of their medical advisors even likened talc usage to smoking.

Talc-based cosmetics are forbidden in the European Union, according to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (among other sources), owing to their possible carcinogenic effects.

According to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, talcum powder might be deemed “toxic to ovarian tissue” according to a 2015 research. Regardless of whether or not talc includes asbestos, the campaign warns against using it in the pelvic region.

Talc usage around the genitals is now considered a “risk factor” for ovarian cancer by both the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society. Despite this potential relationship, Johnson & Johnson and other talc powder makers have not included any warnings on their packaging.

Cases Involving Talcum Powder

Deane Berg, a physician’s assistant, sued Johnson & Johnson in 2013 after developing ovarian cancer, which she claims was caused by her habitual use of baby powder. Ms. Berg declined a $1.3 million settlement and took the issue to court, where Johnson & Johnson was found guilty of negligence, fraud, and conspiracy for failing to warn women about the health dangers associated with its products.

Mona Estrada of California filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson in April 2014, alleging that the company failed to notify women about the elevated risk of ovarian cancer. Barbara Mihalich of Illinois filed a class action lawsuit the next month, claiming that Johnson & Johnson used fraudulent business tactics and benefited unfairly from their talc products. (Neither Ms. Estrada nor Ms. Mihalich have ovarian cancer or any other talc-related health problems.)

J&J was found guilty of carelessness, fraud, and neglecting to warn women about the health dangers associated with their products.

Gloria Ristesund developed ovarian cancer after using Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower Powder on her pelvic region for decades, and a Missouri jury concluded in her favor in May 2016. (Ms. Ristesund had to have a hysterectomy and other procedures as a consequence.) Ms. Ristesund was awarded $55 million by the jury, including $50 million in punitive damages and $5 million in compensatory damages.

Lois Slemp (62) of Wise, Virginia was awarded $110 million by a jury in St. Louis in May 2017. Ms. Slemp claimed that during a 40-year period, her daily use of Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower products led her to develop ovarian cancer, which subsequently migrated to her liver. Ms. Slemp also claimed that Johnson’s Baby Powder included asbestos, which was refuted by the business.

The jury overwhelmingly favored Ms. Slemp. Punitive damages accounted for $105 million of the $110 million award.

Injuries Caused by Talc Compensation

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer as a result of using talcum powder or baby powder, a class action lawsuit will not compensate you for medical expenditures or other damages incurred as a result of the cancer diagnosis.

Consumers who bought the powders are seeking reimbursement for the cost of the powders in pending class action lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson, regardless of whether they acquired cancer.

You may, however, be able to bring a case apart from the class action to seek compensation for any losses incurred as a result of a cancer diagnosis. This might include medical fees from the past and future, lost income, pain and suffering, and funeral costs (in the case of a loved one’s death).

We only charge a fee if the matter is successfully resolved, either via a jury award or an out-of-court settlement. To find out whether you are due money, contact us immediately.

The “Talcum Powder Ovarian and Cervical Cancer Lawsuit” is a lawsuit that has been filed in the United States. The plaintiff alleges that talcum powder causes ovarian and cervical cancer. Reference: what is going on with talcum powder cases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average payout for talcum powder lawsuit?

A: The average payout for talcum powder lawsuit is $1.75 million USD.

Has anyone received money from talcum powder lawsuit?

A: Unfortunately, the answer to this question is no. The talcum powder lawsuit was settled in 2016.

Does the baby powder lawsuit include cervical cancer?

A: Cervical cancer is not included in the baby powder lawsuit. The reasoning behind this was because it would be too complicated to include, and that there are other forms of cancer that could potentially come into play with the class-action suit for cervical cancer.

Related Tags

  • talcum powder lawsuit update 2020
  • does talcum powder cause cervical cancer
  • talcum powder lawsuit criteria
  • how does talcum powder cause ovarian cancer
  • johnson and johnson cervical cancer lawsuit