Babyganics Lawsuit – Child Injured by Tear-Free Bath Products

In a lawsuit brought by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Babyganics and several other companies are ordered to pay $3.5 million in damages for injuries caused by tear-free bath products. The injury was sustained while bathing a toddler who developed chemical burns as a result of not being provided with adequate warnings about the product’s potential adverse effects when used on babies

The “scentbird class action lawsuit” is a case in which a child was injured by tear-free bath products. The company has been sued and the case will be going to trial soon.

Babyganics Lawsuit - Child Injured by Tear-Free Bath Products

Babyganics is a firm established in Westbury, New York that promises to market baby-safe, organic home and childcare items (shampoos, suntan lotions, baby wipes, laundry detergents, etc.). It has developed quickly over the last 15 years, bringing in $30 million in sales in 2013 and was purchased by SC Johnson in 2016.

Several lawsuits have been filed against Babyganics due to the possibly dangerous nature of its contents.

Many parents, however, claim that Babyganics products are not as natural or child-friendly as they look. There have been instances of children’s eyes being burnt by Babyganics “tear-free” products, as well as at least one kid breaking out in a rash after using Babyganics baby wipes.

Babyganics is currently facing many lawsuits over the potentially dangerous nature of its chemicals as a result of occurrences like these. A class action lawsuit filed by claims that various Babyganics bath products include eye irritants and are not as “tear-free,” “safe,” or “gentle” as claimed.

Eligibility & Lawsuit Allegations

Our complaint seeks to hold Babyganics liable for the allegedly deceptive labeling of certain Babyganics bath products that claim to be “tear-free,” “gentle,” “non-allergenic,” and “safe for newborns.” According to the complaint, the following nine goods (mentioned below) include chemicals and other elements that irritate the eyes:

  • Shampoo and Body Wash with Chamomile Verbena Chamomile Verbena Shampoo & Body Wash Chamomile Verbena Shampoo &
  • Chamomile Verbena Shampoo & Body Wash
  • Bubble Bath with Chamomile and Verbena
  • Conditioning Shampoo & Body Wash with No Fragrance
  • Shampoo and Body Wash with No Fragrance
  • Bubble Bath with No Fragrance
  • Moisturizing Therapy Cream Wash with No Fragrance
  • Night Time Orange Blossom Shampoo & Body Wash
  • Nighttime Bubble Bath with Orange Blossoms

We are seeking monetary compensation for plaintiffs who bought these goods, as well as a cease-and-desist order from Babyganics to discontinue deceptively selling these products.

We’ve requested plaintiffs to discover and save any receipts linked to these transactions, as well as record any adverse reactions their kid may have had during or after using Babyganics products, such as burning, discomfort, itching, or rashes.

Complaints about Babyganics

Allegations that Babyganics products aren’t as safe as they claim have been made before.

In May 2017, a rough rash on the face of Ms. Christensen’s five-week-old baby Leif was blamed on Babyganics Face, Hand, and Baby Wipes, according to an Oregon lady named Jade Christensen. She saw black patches on the wipes, implying that mold had grown on them, and discovered numerous other similar complaints about the product online.

A rough rash on the face of a five-week-old kid was reportedly caused by Babyganics baby wipes.

In response to the concerns, Babyganics promised to replace any wipes with black spots and assured parents that the wipes had been thoroughly tested and were not harmful to their health.

However, the Jade Christensen episode was not the first time Babyganics had to deal with allegations that its products were not as advertised.

A third complaint was filed against Babyganics in September 2016, saying that their “tear-free” shampoo had burnt a boy’s eyes, perhaps permanently scarring them. Theresa Jones stated her infant boy Hunter had corneal burns on 90% of his corneas, which doctors blamed on the chemicals in the Babyganics shampoo, and that Hunter might have vision difficulties for the rest of his life.

Ms. Jones claimed she discovered a slew of internet complaints from mothers whose children had been harmed by Babyganics products.


Have you found what you’re looking for?


A “class action lawsuit case” has been filed against the company Babyganics, following a child being injured after using its tear-free bath products.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Pantene in a lawsuit?

A: Pantene is currently being sued by a company called LOréal. They claim that in 2014, they approached Pantene and attempted to purchase the rights for their products before any other companies could do so as well, but instead of giving it up they decided to sue them because of this.

Is Babyganics sulfate free?

A: Yes, Babyganics is sulfate free.

Does baby shampoo burn eyes?

A: I cannot answer this question, it is only a fact that the chemical properties in baby shampoo are able to burn eyes.

Related Tags

  • consumer class action database
  • how to join t-mobile class action lawsuit 2021
  • plaid settlement payout per person
  • give me the latest lawsuit settlement
  • open class action lawsuits no proof