Whistleblower Claims – Qui Tam Lawsuits – Whistleblower Lawyers

Qui Tam Lawsuits are a type of lawsuit in which private citizens or whistleblowers can pursue federal civil lawsuits on behalf of the United States government against businesses that have violated certain laws. The whistleblower’s only cost is their time, but they stand to gain up to 30% of recovered damages when an award is made.

The “who can be a whistleblower according to the qui tam provisions in the false claims act?” is a question that has been asked by many people. The answer is that any person who has knowledge of fraud against the United States government or any state, local, or tribal government may file a qui tam lawsuit.

Whistleblower laws protect and reward persons who expose misconduct in the American economy. Some of the world’s most prominent businesses have defrauded the American people on several occasions. Much of that fraud would undoubtedly go undetected if it weren’t for the efforts of those dedicated to speaking out for what’s right.

Whistleblowers have played a key role in revealing corporate financial crimes such as Enron’s.

Corporate financial crimes such as Enron, Pfizer, Bank of America, and Boeing have been exposed thanks to whistleblowers. They’ve also uncovered military contractor fraud that may have put our soldiers in danger in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they’ve helped save lives in environmental fraud instances like the Flint water contamination debacle.

Many businesses, including healthcare, military, pharmaceutical sales, manufacturing, education, construction, and finance, provide cash incentives to whistleblowers who disclose wrongdoing. The majority of these regulations pertain to those who report corporate wrongdoing against the government or taxpayers.

Defend Against Corporate Greed

The False Claims Act is a federal law that prohibits businesses from making false claims (FCA)

The False Claims Act is the oldest whistleblower statute in the United States. President Abraham Lincoln signed the False Claims Act (FCA) in 1863 after contractors supplied false ammunition, ill horses, and other substandard military supplies to the Union Army during the American Civil War.

Any contractor who intentionally submitted misleading claims to the government was subject to financial penalties under the FCA. Citizens who submitted reliable information to the government about a contractor’s fraud were also entitled for a percentage of the government’s recovery.


Since the Civil War, the FCA has experienced several revisions, the most notable of which occurred in 1986, when President Ronald Reagan signed key improvements to the legislation. The revisions reinforced whistleblower rights against retaliation, as well as increasing fines for fraudulent parties and whistleblower prize levels.

Whistleblowers who disclose fraud and lead to a successful government action, such as a settlement or punishment, are now entitled for 15% to 25% of the amount recovered by the government. The exact percentage granted is determined by a number of criteria, including the value of the whistleblower’s information, the type of the fraud, and the total punishment amount.

Many more laws now exist to safeguard individuals who have the courage and integrity to speak up against corporate greed across sectors, thanks to the work of whistleblowers and their allies in government.

Injuries to patients in the healthcare industry

The healthcare industry is the most common source of fraud, waste, and abuse in the United States.

The government, which oversees Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE, is unable to detect every incident of fraud in these programs. When fraud is detected, it is often up to persons with inside access to these systems, such as physicians, nurses, billing experts, and other healthcare professionals, to report it.

The healthcare industry is the most common source of fraud, waste, and abuse in the United States.

By bringing a case under the False Claims Act, whistleblowers with proof of healthcare fraud may be eligible for incentives and legal safeguards. Qui tam actions are those in which a person sues a firm on behalf of the government.

Hospitals, nursing homes, mental health institutions, hospices, clinical laboratories, and pharmacies have all been found to be involved in healthcare fraud. Patients are regularly victimized as a result of it allowing inadequate treatment and, in some cases, open abuse.

Universal Health Services (UHS), a mental health care firm, has been under government examination for years. According to recent charges, the corporation forced non-suicidal counseling patients into mental units in order to maximize insurance payouts. Many of these patients claim they were harassed and mistreated while at UHS.

Due to the magnitude of public healthcare systems, both non-profit and for-profit healthcare institutions are susceptible to FCA billing breaches. These are some of them:

  • Upcoding a patient’s diagnosis or therapy in order to earn a greater insurance payment.
  • Payments or gifts in return for patient referrals or prescriptions are known as kickbacks.
  • Substitution of Generic Drugs: Changing name-brand prescriptions to generics and then paying public health insurance for the name-brand therapy.




Pharmaceutical Marketing Tactics That Aren’t What They Seem

Pharmaceutical firms’ misbehavior has been a thorn in the side of taxpayers, the government, and patients for decades. Big Pharma is made up of some of the world’s wealthiest companies, and it is constantly interested with preserving its power and profits—often at the cost of the American people.

FCA lawsuits have been essential in putting an end to damaging pharmaceutical business practices such as Purdue’s.

The worldwide opioid epidemic is the most recent reminder of the consequences of Big Pharma’s avarice. Companies like Purdue Pharma are being held responsible for deceptive marketing techniques that may have resulted in millions of deaths and the ruin of whole communities throughout the nation, notably in Appalachia and the Southwest.

False Claims Act litigation have aided in the abolition of detrimental pharmaceutical business practices such as Purdue’s. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) pleaded guilty to accusations of improper marketing and FDA fraud in 2012, ending the pharmaceutical industry’s biggest whistleblower litigation. As a consequence, GSK was obliged to pay $3 billion in criminal and civil penalties.

Whistleblowers who exposed purposeful unlawful marketing tactics, FDA safety breaches, and bribes have helped save thousands of lives and millions of dollars in government money. Many pharmaceutical whistleblowers who brought False Claims Act actions have been rewarded handsomely.

In the financial sector, there is a lot of greed.

Following the financial crisis of 2008, the US government made it a priority to rein down corporate greed. One of the greatest and most successful whistleblower schemes in the world is included in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was approved in 2010.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) both enforce Dodd-whistleblower Frank’s rules, albeit each maintains its own whistleblower program.

Companies that commit financial crimes such as insider trading, financial reporting fraud, and misrepresenting to investors face penalties under Dodd-Frank. Since the program’s inception, the SEC has given $136 million to 37 whistleblowers who have successfully assisted the agency in investigating such infractions.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rewarded a whistleblower $30 million in 2014. It gave a former Monsanto executive $22 million in 2016.

To be eligible for a monetary award, SEC and CFTC whistleblowers must disclose original information (that is, fresh information that the agency could not have figured out on its own) and lead to a $1 million recovery from the fraudulent firm. Whistleblowers who satisfy these requirements might receive between 10% and 30% of the money collected.

One kind of financial fraud is IRS fraud (tax evasion). Bribing foreign officials is another crime that is punishable under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The most well-known FCPA case included Siemens, a worldwide manufacturing giant that paid foreign government officials in return for commercial transactions on a regular basis. The business was required to pay penalties to the US and German governments totaling $1.6 billion.

Defects in the Automobile Industry that are Deadly

Many automakers have been accused of cutting shortcuts in order to increase revenues. Following shocking allegations against Takata, whose defective airbags have killed 16 people and injured 150 others, lawmakers enacted the Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act (MVSWA) in December 2015.

Whistleblowers assisted the federal authorities in gathering evidence for the Takata investigation.

Whistleblowers assisted the federal authorities in gathering information to probe the airbag manufacturer. These people said that Takata was aware of its products’ flaws for years yet continued to sell the airbags to manufacturers despite knowing about them.

Many other automobile and auto component manufacturers, like Volkswagen and GM, have had to recall parts owing to safety concerns, injuries, and fatalities.

Whistleblowers in the auto sector who assist the government recover an additional $1 million from a fraudulent manufacturer might get 10% to 30% of the total. Most crucially, the new legislation protects business whistleblowers from reprisal.




Hazards to the Environment in Vulnerable Communities

Every person has the right to breathe clean air, drink safe water, and live in a secure and healthy environment. Unfortunately, many businesses and organizations have engaged in environmental fraud, prioritizing profits above the health and safety of communities around the United States.

The Flint water disaster is one of the most serious cases of environmental fraud, since municipal authorities’ purposeful carelessness resulted in widespread lead poisoning of children and adults.

The good news is that polluters such as oil companies, energy firms, automobile manufacturers, and government agencies may be held responsible. The following are some of the laws that enable whistleblowers to report environmental fraud:

  • The Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970.
  • The Safe Drinking Water Act
  • The Energy Reorganization Act is a law that reorganizes the energy sector
  • The Toxic Substances Control Act is a federal law that regulates the use of toxic substances.




Speak Up in a Secure Environment

It would be significantly more difficult for the government to halt fraud in its tracks without whistleblowers. Despite the fact that many organizations continue to attempt to get away with fraud, a 2016 research from the University of Iowa found that whistleblower cases eventually improve company conduct. That type of influence is significant when it comes to topics like public health, environmental safety, and economic success.

Contact us right now to determine whether you qualify for a whistleblower claim.

Whistleblower Claims – Qui Tam Lawsuits – Whistleblower Lawyers. The “whistleblower lawyers near me” is a term used when someone has accused an individual or company of wrongdoing and then goes to the government with their claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are qui tam lawsuits How are whistleblowers rewarded in such lawsuits?

A: Qui tam suits, which are filed by private parties who believe that a company purposely caused injuries to consumers or violated consumer protection laws and then seek monetary damages on behalf of the government, allow whistleblowers to file claims.

What is a qui tam lawyer?

A: A qui tam lawyer is a person who sues on behalf of the government.

What happens if a qui tam lawsuit is not successful?

A: In a qui tam lawsuit, the plaintiff initiates legal action against someone who is allegedly committing fraud on behalf of a company. If the person claiming to have been defrauded wins their case and receives money from that company it will be awarded as compensation for costs associated with bringing the suit, but if they lose then there would not be any further financial benefits.

Related Tags

  • if the government chooses to join in a qui tam suit, the relator may
  • qui tam false claims act
  • qui tam whistleblower
  • top whistleblower attorneys
  • qui tam relator