Johnson & Johnson is a company that has been in business for 125 years, and it’s annual sales are close to $30 billion. Last year alone the company paid over $1.5 million dollars on products just so their baby would go to sleep. The problem with this is that parents often don’t have enough money to buy these items themselves, which means they can be forced into an expensive gamble of buying used or counterfeit goods (as some sellers will do)
Johnson & Johnson Pays for Baby Bedtime Products. Johnson & Johnson is a company that has been around since 1852. They are one of the biggest companies in the world with over $130 billion in annual revenue. Read more in detail here: johnson products.
Desperate parents will do everything to get their baby to sleep, even if it means spending extra for a lotion or body wash. According to recent class action lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson exploited parents by deceptively promoting their infant nighttime products.
Last Monday, the business proposed to pay $5 million to resolve four class action cases. According to the cases, the corporation tricked customers into paying a higher price for its goods by recklessly utilizing the phrase “clinically proven” to bolster claims that its nighttime items helped infants fall asleep.
Take a look at our J&J infographic.
J&J puts their bedtime routine to the test, not the products.
“With the exception of the bedtime goods, J&J did not test the ‘routine’ with any other products.”
Johnson & Johnson promotes a three-step sleep regimen for newborns that involves a warm bath, massage, and quiet time on their website. The firm advises utilizing one of their bedtime products throughout the explanation of the ritual. They contain references to “studies” and “research” that back up each step’s efficacy.
The accusations brought against Johnson & Johnson focused on the role their products played in the regimen, not whether it worked or not.
“J&J did not test the ‘routine’ with items other than the bedtime products, such as J&J’s long-sold conventional bath products, another company’s products, or no products at all,” according to a California lawsuit.
The infant sleep regimen may be useful, but Johnson & Johnson has no data to back up their claims that their products are better than others.
From the perspective of the customer, this lack of research is difficult to detect just by looking at the items. Consumers may be misled into believing that the routine and suite of bedtime items are similarly “clinically proven” to help infants sleep since the routine and suite of bedtime products are so intertwined, particularly on product labels.
This mistake isn’t unexpected, according to an Illinois lawsuit, since Johnson & Johnson “does not offer routines—it sells sleep products.” It would be counterproductive for them to promote a routine rather than one of their goods.
The claims are in violation of the FTC’s advertising guidelines.
The assertions made by Johnson & Johnson are in violation of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) advertising guidelines, which prevent businesses from making claims that are likely to mislead consumers and influence their decision to buy a product.
While Johnson & Johnson is paying the price this time, comparable incidents of misleading advertising abound in the cosmetics sector, which may be due to a lack of government supervision.
Cosmetics rules in the United States are just one page long and have not been amended in 75 years.
Cosmetics items now do not need FDA clearance and are not obliged to disclose their components. Cosmetics rules in the United States are just one page long and haven’t been amended in 75 years.
Cosmetics businesses may make deceptive promises due to lax restrictions, such as aloe vera gels that don’t include aloe vera or keratin hair treatments that don’t contain keratin.
J& J is in desperate need of further federal oversight.
While deceptive promises encourage customers to spend more money on high-end items, a lack of government monitoring may have much more disastrous effects, as Johnson & Johnson knows all too well.
Several lawsuits have been filed against the firm for their baby powder, which has been related to ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson has been sued over 1,000 times for failing to notify customers about the powder’s cancer risk.
The Personal Care Products Safety Act was presented in the Senate in 2015 to address the cosmetics industry’s existing lack of control. The law, if approved, would force corporations to register their ingredients with the FDA and give the FDA the authority to recall dangerous goods.
Companies like Johnson & Johnson may need more control.
We want to hear from you if you’ve been hurt by Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder or if you’ve been deceived into paying for expensive items that don’t live up to their promises. For a free, no-obligation consultation, contact our legal team.
Watch This Video-
Johnson & Johnson is the largest health care company in the world with over $130 billion in annual revenue. They have been around for more than 130 years, and are known for their baby bedtime products. Reference: johnson & johnson logo.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Johnson?
A: Johnson is a male given name. It has been used as both a surname and first name since the Middle Ages in England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales. Its likely derived from Old English pre 7th century Hwīnne which meant with me.
What are Johnson & Johnson products?
A: Johnson & Johnson is a major U.S.-based multinational company that produces and markets health care products, including medicine for personal use, housewares and cleaning items, as well as food-related goods such as non-stick pans.
What does Johnson and Johnson vaccine contain?
A: The Johnson and Johnson vaccine contains a mixture of antigens used for vaccination against different diseases. It is most commonly used in cases of anthrax, smallpox, tetanus or diphtheria.
- johnson & johnson
- johnson & johnson vaccine
- johnson and johnson covid vaccine
- johnson & johnson products
- johnson and johnson wiki